Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Israeli Religious Zionism is not Anglo Modern Orthodoxy (guest post)

I don't think I've ever had a guest post on this blog, but my friend Rabbi Dr. David Mescheloff has put together a wonderful primer on the nature(s) of Religious Zionism in Israel, and I have found it most instructive. With his permission, I am posting it here:




Rabbi Dr. David Mescheloff, Moshav Hemed, 
Marcheshvan 5773  /  November 2012

This article should provide an introduction to the religious Zionist community in Israel, and the great variety of world outlooks subsumed under that title.

Members of "the religious Zionist community" (RZC) in Israel share a common commitment to Torah and mitzvot, and to living according to halakha.  They also share a favorable attitude towards the State of Israel and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), which they see as bearing religious significance. They are committed to the welfare and the unity of the Jewish people, and to the continued ingathering of our exiles.

Yet, while these shared beliefs and commitments hold them together loosely, nevertheless they may be divided into several distinct groups based on several factors.  I will describe them briefly, "min ha-kal el ha-kaved" (from the "lighter" to the "heavier"). I will not relate to the fact that there are RZ people in different proportions in all of Israel's political parties, which are constantly shuffling and reshuffling both personally and ideologically.

1) Some of the divisions are along "country of origin" lines – much more complex than just Sephardi-Ashkenazi, but rather Yemenite/Moroccan/Syrian/Iraqi/Turkish (for a start) and Polish/German/Russian/Western European/English-speaking countries (for a start). These distinctions are becoming increasingly blurred as marriages across these lines have been increasing in frequency for two generations or more, yet they still play a divisive role, particularly in the establishment of community synagogues or prayer groups along these lines. Nevertheless, it is unusual to find genuine hostility across these lines in the RZC.

2) Another division is along geographical lines in Israel: one can identify significant differences between center/urban/well-established communities on one hand and periphery/rural (kibbutz and moshav)/newer towns in Yehuda and Shomron.

3) Yet another division has to do with perceived level of religious observance (I emphasize the word "perceived"; it concerns both how people perceive themselves and how they perceive others).  The range is from "dati light" (still sometimes called "mizrachinik", a pejorative term that is largely historical) through "dati" and on to "chardali" (acronym of charedim le'umi'im, national "stricter" Orthodox).

In the next two sections, about rabbanim and yeshivot, I will list some of "the major players". I will not characterize them, and will not "give them grades".  Each one is excellent, and each is different from every other. Some of them can be grouped together with others, but I will not indicate who is associated with whom.  Where I can, I will give an internet address for the rabbanim and the yeshivot, and you, the reader, can form your own impression from the image each one chooses to present himself/itself.  Do not lend any importance to the number of links I attach to any one name.  With that introduction, let's continue.

4) There are followers, admirers, students, and others who adhere to different rabbanim, each of whom has his own "camp". Here are twelve from among the major RZ publicly recognized rabbinic leaders and educators with significant followings and who differ on various ideological issues on which they take public stands (in no special order).  They are prolific writers; some of the links below can lead you to their books and articles. 

R; Yaakov Ariel (Ramat Gan - http://www.haravariel.com/ and a sample teshuva on cloning:  http://www.daat.ac.il/daat/kitveyet/shana/ariel-1.htm),



R. Yuval Cherlow (Petach Tikva - http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%99%D7%95%D7%91%D7%9C_%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%9C%D7%95  See some sample shiurim at:


R. Dr. Aharon Lichtenstein (and his colleagues at Elon Shevut –
and many shiurim can be accessed at http://etzion.haretzion.org/



R. Eliezer Melamed (Berakha – http://yhb.org.il/?page_id=458

and here is an item on his magnum opus on the Rambam
and an interview at

And see shiurim at his site, http://ybn.co.il/
And about his method of studying Tanakh:  http://www.ypt.co.il/show.asp?id=20296

And see his site:  http://ravsherki.org/

These and/or their students and/or their followers appear in print or in public forums frequently, and are asked by "the media" to express their opinions on public issues frequently
There are more.  Indeed, the RZ world is blessed with a very large number of genuine talmidei chakhamim and communal leaders, many of them young and on their way up in the public's awareness.  The absence of the name of any particular Rav from the list above should not be taken as a reflection on his Torah greatness or of his influence. The list is far from exhaustive.  Here is a report of a meeting of a dozen "elders" of RZ rabbanim in the winter of 5772, where you can see the names of some other prominent figures:  http://www.srugim.co.il/25949-%D7%91%D7%93%D7%A8%D7%9A-%D7%9C%D7%90%D7%97%D7%93%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%9B%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%A1-%D7%A9%D7%9C-%D7%96%D7%A7%D7%A0%D7%99-%D7%A8%D7%91%D7%A0%D7%99-%D7%94%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%AA?di=1

5)  There are divisions based on association with various yeshivot. The RZC has grown considerably in the past two generations.  Tens of thousands of "graduates" of the various RZ yeshivot , each with markedly different ideologies (see below), are "out there" in Israeli society – either as individuals or in communities and urban "gar'inim Torani'im"  - in the IDF, and in the various RZ educational systems and institutions, each trying to influence Israeli society in general and the RZC in particular in his own direction.  

Here are thirteen of the major yeshivot with significant numbers of graduates and followings, whose leaders do not see eye-to-eye on various ideological issues.  I cannot do justice to a description of the nuanced differences between them in this brief post.  You can form your own impression by visiting the internet sites maintained by the various institutions (see below).  Each exerts a major influence on its immediate surrounding community and throughout the RZC and Israel, through its teachers, students, and graduates, and through a variety of powerful educational and public service initiatives.



Har Berakha (http://yhb.org.il/),



Kerem B'Yavneh  (http://www.kby.org/hebrew/)

Birkat Moshe (Ma'aleh Adumim) (http://www.ybm.org.il/Hebrew/)



Ramat Gan (http://www.yrg.org.il/),

'Ateret Yerushalayim (used to be 'Ateret Cohanim) (http://www.ateret.org.il/hebrew/),

Petach Tikva (http://www.ypt.co.il/)

It is not possible to list them all, not even the ones of major importance.  I leave it to the reader to examine the nuances of the differences between them.  One should add to the leading yeshivot: 'Eli, Ma'alot, 'Otniel, 'Or 'Etzion, Shavei Hevron, and Nir-Kiryat Arba. Each has its own unique character.
Another institution that should be mentioned because of its influence on many young RZ men and women, although it is not usually thought of as a yeshiva because of its association with Bar-Ilan University, is HaMakhon Ha-Gavoah L'Torah (http://www.mgl.org.il/).

It is also important to note that there are RZ institutions for the advanced Jewish education of women.  Here are seven among the most influential – again, with significant differences in orientation, and in no particular order –

Ha-Midrasha L'Nashim at Bar-Ilan University (http://midrasha.biu.ac.il/),

Midreshet Ha-Rova (http://harova.org/site/),


Midreshet Lindenbaum (http://www.lind.org.il/),

the women's program at Beit Morasha (http://www.bmj.org.il/),

Midreshet Nishmat (http://www.nishmat.net/),
MaTaN – Midreshet Torah l'Nashim (http://www.matan.org.il/).

The absence of any particular yeshiva or women's institution from the list above should not be construed as reflecting on its significance, the greatness of its heads, or its influence.  The list is not intended to be exhaustive.  I personally find the rich variety among these RZC institutions to be exciting, stimulating, and inspiring (even where I don't agree with this or that ideological preference or educational approach) – all of these different world-views, and they are all Religious Zionist!

6) Now a brief word about divisions within the Israeli RZC according to positions on certain ideological issues.  

Unlike American Modern Orthodoxy, not all RZC groupings, institutions, and leaders, share favorable attitudes towards 1 - "contemporary Western culture and democracy" (which they do not all define in the same terms), 2 - academic/scientific/professional education/scholarship/achievement, and 3 - women and their involvement in public life and increased non-traditional public religious activities.
  
The ideological differences between the various RZ groups are too difficult to summarize briefly. The ideological dividing lines are often highly nuanced; an outsider would find it difficult to understand why the opposing sides fight with such vigor. Yet one who wants to understand the Israeli religious Zionist scene should be aware that - although all RZC groups have much more in common than divides them, yet the differences that rise to the surface mean a lot to them all, and do produce genuine flare-ups from time to time.

Let me add one more word about RZ rabbinical groups in Israel.  Tzohar is well-known by now (http://www.tzohar.org.il/).  Less well known are three groups from the past two years. One is actually a group that had become dormant, but reorganized and expanded beginning in Kislev 5771, "Derekh Emunah".  Its member rabbis are primarily former students of R. Tzvi Yehuda Kook zt"l of Yeshivat Mercaz HaRav, whose principal aim is to promulgate their teacher's heritage concerning the centrality of Eretz Yisrael in Jewish spiritual life.  The second group, "the rabbis' forum", is an informal closed email google group of some 300 Israeli community rabbanim and high level educators that began after Purim 5771. The members represent a rich variety of ideological approaches, and the forum provides a meeting place in which halakhic, hashkafic and communal issues are discussed intensively from every possible perspective.  The third group, "Bet Hillel", was formed less than a year ago, and seeks to provide a moderate rabbinic voice, attentive to public needs, on the Israeli scene.  It includes scholarly women in its ranks as equal members with the rabbanim. See http://www.facebook.com/B.Hillel.

One who desires to understand the rich tapestry of Torah that the RZ world is producing would do well to understand the complexity of the picture outlined above.  R. Eliyahu the Gaon of Vilna wrote at the beginning of his commentary to Mishlei (Proverbs) of the importance of knowing whose thoughts you are reading, who his ancestors were, what position he holds, and where he comes from, in order to understand and value his Torah.

Nevertheless, I recommend keeping in mind the following story I heard recently, that happened here in Israel.  A young man from one of the RZ yeshivot above had met a learned young RZ woman.  They met a few times to examine the possibility of marriage and building a family together.  The young woman, however, was plagued with uncertainty.  She kept asking the young man about the views of his rebbeim on various issues, and wasn't always happy about the answers.  On their fourth date, after she continued her inquiries, he said to her, "Why do you keep asking me what my rebbeim think?  Why don't you want to know what I think?" Startled, she realized she had been on the wrong track, and followed his suggestion.  They now are a happy couple, beginning a promising life together. 

Please remember: the only way to know a person is through personal contact.

May G-d grant strength (= Torah) to His people, and may G-d bless His people with peace (= harmony and mutual respect, with appreciation of the spiritual wealth G-d grants us in making us all different from each other).


 

Sunday, November 4, 2012

A way to let go

Many years ago, at the start of my shul rabbinate, I learned to appreciate Shabbos.

Before that, my weekday schedule was full but it generally lacked real tension, items which would eat at me until they were concluded. Starting in shul life – as in most careers, I assume – meant that I had conflicts with others that needed resolution, long-term projects that were complicated and came with high stakes, and so on. It was only with Lecha Dodi (a song in the Kabbalat Shabbat segment of Friday night prayers) that I would have to shrug and say, "This will wait." I remember the lift that came with doing that for the first time, saying, "This is off my plate for the next 25 hours."

[As I have said on other occasions, I may be the only Jew who enjoys, and looks forward to, a three-day Yom Tov. Three days with my family, with a chance to rest, with a chance to turn off all of those conflicts and projects – who cares how many classes and speeches I need to present? This is olam haba!]

This past Friday night I chanced upon a technique that adds to my ability to tune out for Shabbos. Kabbalat Shabbat begins with six paragraphs of Tehillim [Psalms], which we are taught correlate with the six phases of Creation. This week, though, it occurred to me that each could also correlate with the six days of the previous week. So as I read each chapter, I thought about what had happened on that day, during the past week. To pick the big items: Sunday was a breakfast shiur, a hachnasas sefer torah [installation of a new Torah], and a dinner in honour of our shul's new Rabbi. Monday was a mess of phone calls and article-writing, a medical shiur and the onslaught of Hurricane Sandy. Tuesday was the arrival of leaders of Torah miTzion for their annual North American Convention, a Navi shiur, and cooking dinner (carrot and onion omelette) for the kids. Wednesday was the Convention, two shiurim, editing Toronto Torah. Thursday was more Convention, for the most part, as well as a meeting that brought me a world of frustration. Friday was more Convention, and preparation of shiurim for Shabbos.

As I read each chapter, I thought about the events from that day of the week, and tried to drop them from my mind, to see them as "done". Surprisingly, it worked pretty well. And so I could enter Lecha Dodi having let go, with a feeling that the week was over, and it was time for Shabbos. I could feel my shoulders lift.

Please let me know if you try it and it works for you, or send me your own techniques.

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Life at a Jewish Funeral

A few weeks ago, I began a series of sessions on "Life in the Rabbinate" for my avreichim here in the Beit Midrash. In our sessions, we talk about practical issues that come up in the pulpit rabbinate; I generally present anecdotes and issues which came up in my shul years, and we talk about how to handle particular situations.

Our opening topic was "Chevra Kadisha and Funerals", and we had a lot to discuss; we've had two sessions and we're not done. Among the questions we have looked at already:

How do you help a chevra kadisha to codify their policies and customs?

Do we really put a body on the floor if someone dies in the hospital?

Would we perform a taharah before a cremation?

What's a taharah certificate?

What comes up when transporting a body across state or federal lines?

Who may see the body, and when?

What is a kosher casket?

How many eulogies, and who speaks?

Is it really okay to say, "Today is Rosh Chodesh and we don't give eulogies, but I just want to say" and then go on to present a eulogy?

How do you eulogize someone you have never met? Or should you decline?

How can you help a family get ready for a funeral?

What equipment should a rabbi always have at the ready?

Who is in charge at the cemetery – Rabbi? Funeral Director? Head of the Chevra Kadisha? Cemetery Employees?

Are we allowed to have cement liners in graves?

Who carries the casket?

And there is a lot more waiting for the third session…

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

For Rabbis: How to avoid being intimidating

I spent a lot of time this past weekend at my friend and Rabbi's shul installation. One point noted by many speakers is that this Rabbi is beloved for his approachability.

This is not a small thing; how can you offer counsel and support when people are afraid to talk to you? And it's not necessarily easy to achieve, given the title and its baggage, as well as the popular rabbinic costume of dark suit, beard and hat. [I have my own problem of PermascowlTM, thanks largely to bone structure. It was useful on the New York subway of my youth, but it's just annoying now.]

Several years ago, in a different venue, I asked what Rabbis could do in order to avoid being intimidating. Here are some of the responses I received:

* Open your divrei torah with a joke [I don't like this approach, where it is intentional; I know the gemara about it, but it feels like pandering. "Please, please! Like me! Look, I'll do a trick for you!" I'll tell a joke when I feel like it.]

* Play racquetball

* Have a pet python [I had a boa constrictor as a kid, does that count?]

* Always have a joke on hand

* Walk around with a yo-yo

* Keep a kazoo, maracas or set of castanets with you

* Be seen socially with your wife, outside of a shul setting

* Practice smiling

* Dye your beard purple

* Wear a blue shirt (the beard is more likely; I don't know how to match a tie with a coloured shirt)

What would you add?





Sunday, October 28, 2012

Men, Women and the Synagogue

The problem of equal participation in the synagogue has come up a lot recently, in part stemming from the annual Simchas Torah question of whether to hold women's hakafos, and Torah-readings or simulated Torah-readings by and for women.

I am troubled by my own conservative stance on this issue. I believe it's the right stance for the synagogue as it was meant to be, but not for the synagogue as most people perceive it today.

As I understand it, the synagogue, in its origins, was a space for the Jew to express his/her full relationship with Gd. The synagogue was meant to be the site of particular rituals, a mini-Beit haMikdash as it was classically called. Nothing more.

To me, the Jew's relationship with Gd was meant to be expressed and developed in personal life, in private existence, in a grateful modeh ani upon rising and a pensive hamapil upon retiring to bed, in a berachah before eating and a dvar torah at the meal and birkat hamazon at the close, in giving tzedakah and speaking positively of others and giving terumah to the kohanim and maaser to the leviyyim, in planting trees and harvesting crops, in remembering yetziat mitzrayim and developing the land of Israel.

The synagogue was not meant to define my religious experience; it was a place for me to go for krias hatorah, for a minyan to do what a minyan does. And yes, it was male-dominated.

But this viewpoint is hard to swallow today, in a world which generally supports an ahistorical understanding of the synagogue: a community center (beit haknesset) and focal point for all manner of social organization.


Today, the synagogue has become the sum of so much of our Jewish life, and so it makes perfect sense that everyone would see it as part of their religious bailiwick. Of course everyone wants an equal role in synagogue ritual; I believe that many if not most are sincerely seeking inspiration and connection and a substantive role in building a strong religious community.

For the synagogue as people view it today, our current system is an offense to serious women, and the initiatives which my part of the Orthodox community offers to level the playing field only highlight the inequality and deepen the offense. Even the most "avant garde" - taking the Torah through the women's section, having women deliver divrei torah and so on - only underscore the fact that men are the ones to lein, receive aliyos and lead davening.

But to return to my view, the true synagogue is to Judaism what the showroom floor is to automobile manufacturing - an important element, but not where the car is made. It's a shiny space very much on display, but the production, the sale, the driving and the servicing take place elsewhere. And the result of the modern, altered perception of the synagogue is a disaster far beyond the issue of male/female; the result is a Jewish world which often leaves its religion at the door of the synagogue.

Or to use Rav Shimshon Raphael Hirsch's words, from Dayyan Grunfeld's introduction to Horeb (full credit to Rabbi Ezra Goldschmiedt for reminding me of this passage):


If I had the power I would provisionally close all synagogues for a hundred years. Do not tremble at the thought of it, Jewish heart. What would happen? Jews and Jewesses without synagogues, desiring to remain such, would be forced to concentrate on a Jewish life and a Jewish home. The Jewish officials connected with the synagogue would have to look to the only opportunity now open to them - to teach young and old how to live a Jewish life and how to build a Jewish home. All synagogues closed by Jewish hands would constitute the strongest protest against the abandonment of the Torah in home and life.

Imagine if we would do that... but I think it's really too late. Genies don't like to return to their bottles, and synagogues are not apt to lose their centrality. Further, such a move would likely have devastating results, certainly in North America; quite a few 20th century North American communities tried to create "Jewish Community Center"s which did not host religious ritual, and in many of those communities the experiment failed. Further, in my pulpit days I would not have wanted our synagogue to have lost its centrality; we accomplished a great deal of good for a great many people. Should I ever return to the pulpit, it would be to a community synagogue, not a dedicated prayer space.

So we have a synagogue that tries to be old-school mini-Temple as well as community center in a modern world, and it can't really do both without alienating people.

So I don't know what happens now.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Useless Theological Questions

In a recent post, I commented, "These days I find myself much less interested in the question of why Gd created this world, and much more interested in the question of what we can do with it."

I want to explain this a bit, because it could be read as glib, and even patronizing to those who do wonder about these matters. That's not at all where I was going with it. [I was also not claiming to channel Rav Soloveitchik's distinction between those two questions; that's a discussion for another time.]

I am not suggesting that one question is more worthwhile than the other, or that I have progressed to some point which others have not yet achieved. Just the opposite; I'm not sure that I'm okay with this change in myself. I might prefer to be otherwise.

But to the person I am today, the questions of "Why did Gd do X" and "Would Gd do X" have no practical meaning. I might as well ask whether Gd can make a rock He can't lift – the answers are irrelevant in the real world.

Let's pretend that I asked, "Would Gd, as understood traditionally in Judaism, create someone with a deeply homosexual nature and prohibit him from fulfilling them?" and the answer was "No." What would I do then?

Would I stop believing in the traditional Jewish version of Gd, since there are people who claim to have been created with a deeply homosexual nature? Would I abandon Torah? Of course not.

Would I respond differently to people who say they have been created with a deeply homosexual nature? Very unlikely.

It's like asking, "Why does Gd allow good people to suffer?" There are numerous answers, of course, and they offer varying degrees of satisfaction. But none of them affect what I do, in practice.

If I'm not willing to change my ways due to the answer, the question doesn't matter much to me.

On one level I wonder if this is part of the narrowing that comes to many people with age. Pathways of thought can become more rigid with time, certainly. But I don't think that's what it is; I think it's a function of my shift from rabbinate to rosh kollelate.

Since leaving the pulpit, I have narrowed in certain predictable, often very regrettable ways. One way is that my sphere of interactions is reduced; I don't have many opportunities for deep philosophical discussions, between shiurim and chavrusos and shiur preparation. There is little time, if any, for random conversations. As a result, I don’t spend much time thinking about the Why of suffering, and my interest in them has waned in comparison with my interest in questions about the What Now of suffering.

It's not better or worse, regress or progress. It just is.