Showing posts with label Life in the Rabbinate: Promoter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Life in the Rabbinate: Promoter. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Two certainties: Death and Pesach

[Posts I’m thinking about: Intimacy with children and Autism at Everyone Needs Therapy and “Dear Son” at Jack]

It’s not so easy, this business of promoting programs. We need to come up with a coherent, catchy message that combines our various programs into a single, central, attention-grabbing marketable theme, or else the diverse offerings get lost.

Witness the challenge of publicizing our two major programs for this Sunday: A pre-Pesach smorgasbord of shiurim at one local shul in the morning, and then a panel discussion on Brain Death and Organ Donation at another local shul in the evening.



We don’t want multiple marketing campaigns, or people will stop reading our emails. So we want to combine them in one email. But what kind of tag line do you put on the email promoting both of these programs?

Here are my current thoughts (and if you couldn’t tell this was going to be tongue-in-cheek yet, it is):

Two things in life are guaranteed: Death and Pesach

Have a brain dead Pesach this Sunday!


Brain Death at the Seder

Die, Die-yenu

Determining the time of death: Maggid or Nirtzah?

Death by Matzah

Stay at the Seder or Donate a Kidney: Your Choice

How many cups of wine are needed to shut down the brain stem?

Marror: How much is too much?

Please offer your own suggestions…

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Extreme Marketing for Home and Synagogue

I’ve been reading a book called Your Marketing Sucks, by Mark Stevens, and rather enjoying it.

Stevens offers common sense insights in a practical way, presents real-world examples, and name-drops in ways that keep the read fun and interesting. Much of it is pretty obvious, his "Extreme Marketing" isn't that extreme, and there's a lot of hype and filler which gets wearisome, but I still like the book overall.

Among his points, Stevens contends that many businesses ignore easy customers (“low-hanging fruit”). There’s a lot to be said for this.

First, I don’t always agree with it; low-hanging fruit can still be too expensive to be worthwhile.

For example: He would like to see CVS have its pharmacy people offer to get store products for you, when you drop off a prescription. I have often wished they would do this, as a matter of convenience, and he points out that it could translate into extra sales. As he puts it, 5 million pharmacy trips, with $10 each in extra sales, would result in $50 million in profits.

Sounds reasonable… but I don’t think it is. First, CVS knows that if you use their pharmacy, you are quite possibly going to make these purchases yourself, anyway. Second, CVS pharmacies, like most chain-store pharmacies, tend to be minimally staffed; they don’t have time to hunt through the store for your Head and Shoulders marine-scent for semi-sensitive hair and dry skin, in a family-sized bottle. Third, they certainly don’t have money to hire extra staffers for each store.

So it’s not worth the investment of money, and the loss of time from actually serving the pharmacy, in order to offer customers items that many of them would have purchased themselves, anyway. (And particularly in a pharmacy-type store, where many purchases are personal and customers are less likely to want to itemize them face-to-face!) This idea fails on the implementation level.

But I wish we could use “Extreme Marketing” to sell our home to low-hanging fruit, by personalizing for individual viewings... but that seems to be against protocol.

They tell you to leave your home as neutral as possible, so that the visitors will be able to imagine themselves in the home. This makes some sense, but why not have the seller’s agent coordinate with the buyer’s agent, use market research, and let the sellers put out items that may highlight the house in a positive way for the buyers?

Example: If the prospective buyers have young children, we could leave out our air hockey table in the middle of the playroom, to show how the room could be used well. If the prospective buyers like plants, we could leave our plants in different locations, showing the good sunlight they can receive. And so on. But, no – personal stuff is supposed to go away. Pretend you never lived there.

And then there’s the Synagogue. I wish Synagogues would engage in Extreme Marketing, and particularly in the area of Low Hanging Fruit. Unfortunately, rabbis tend to be consumed with serving existing clientele, and so they often miss easy possibilities.

Here’s a current example: I want to know what’s happening in my new Jewish community, since I expect to move there this summer. So I emailed more than a dozen active synagogues and temples, from across denominational lines. I told them I plan to move to Toronto this summer, and I asked if they could add me to their synagogue email lists to keep me informed of what’s going on.

Almost all of the secretaries/office managers/executive directors replied within 48 hours, which is positive. Most of them do have synagogue email lists, which is good.

But the key, to me, is whether synagogue clergy follow up. “Jane gave me your name, she told me you’re moving to the area; where are you moving in? When? Can I help with hospitality/networking/kashering your kitchen/mezuzot/etc?” I won’t tell you just how many offered any such response; it’s embarrassing and lashon hara. But let’s just say I wasn’t fending anyone off. Presumably, the office staff do not have a protocol for passing this information on to the clergy or the lay leadership.

This just seems wrong to me. Aside from chesed, hachnasat orchim, et al - look at it as a chance to market the synagogue!

Yes, there are almost 200,000 Jews in the city, and yes, there are already lots of members to serve, but come on. Someone who emails your office, says he is moving in and asks for information is the lowest of low-hanging fruit. Go for it, folks.