tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7898782635470765614.post4656557236777862598..comments2023-09-11T17:58:13.764-04:00Comments on The Rebbetzin's Husband: Sufi Marriage CounselingThe Rebbetzin's Husbandhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14977193945074906534noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7898782635470765614.post-61785695789383956002018-08-22T23:58:48.009-04:002018-08-22T23:58:48.009-04:00I keep on reading your blog post.. This was still ...I keep on reading your blog post.. This was still amazing. Thanks a lot for sharing this unique informative post with us.. I really enjoyed by reading your blog post.<br /><a href="http://relationship-counseling-milwaukee.com/" rel="nofollow">marriage counseling milwaukee wi</a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01801842596459456944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7898782635470765614.post-2904468259903172862012-06-13T22:11:58.445-04:002012-06-13T22:11:58.445-04:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Counseling Jacksonvillehttp://www.drdarienzo.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7898782635470765614.post-40833870481463878102011-10-25T22:13:10.528-04:002011-10-25T22:13:10.528-04:00bratschegirl-
Thanks! The speaker's main point...bratschegirl-<br />Thanks! The speaker's main point was that the Sages took the separation of Day 2 (between water and water) as a negative, but they didn't apply this to the separation of Day 1 (light and dark) and of Day 4 (night and day). He suggested that this is because Day 2 involves separation between "like" and "like".<br />I think much more is needed here, because the Torah has many cases of positive separation even between "like" and "like".<br /><br />R' Micha-<br />I would love to see that post on R' Shimon Shkop's derech. I'll admit I haven't learned him much. As far as your earlier point on reductionism, much agreed. The whole is _different from_ the sum of its parts.The Rebbetzin's Husbandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14977193945074906534noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7898782635470765614.post-16948597050925404172011-10-25T14:16:52.298-04:002011-10-25T14:16:52.298-04:00Your post appears to be a poetic approach to the p...Your post appears to be a poetic approach to the problem of reductionism -- reducing a problem to smaller and more understandable parts, vs the analysis of emergent properties.<br /><br />Sometimes a system is more determined by how the parts are put together than what the parts are. E.g. there are properties in common between networks of neurons in our brains, computer networks, social networks, etc...<br /><br />I planm on someday soon blogging about a second difference between R' Chaim Brisker's derekh halimud and his student's, R' Shimon Shkop's. (The first, and most discussed, is that R' Chaim would ask "What?" and R' Shimon would also ask "Why?" in finding the distinctions between cases.) Rav Shimon also adds a second primary tool, in addition to finding distinctions (chiluqim). In his derekh, the word "hitztarfus" (fusion), is added to the lexicon. Two cases could differ in ways that reductionism would miss, because one case has a combination of factors that don't combine in the other.micha bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612144735431285113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7898782635470765614.post-7622952028005670612011-10-25T12:36:30.630-04:002011-10-25T12:36:30.630-04:00Would love to hear more about the dvar torah... an...Would love to hear more about the dvar torah... and that's a very insightful point in your last graphbratschegirlnoreply@blogger.com